KASI AI Hub KASI AI Hub

Merger tree-bsasd galaxy matching: A comparative study across different resolution

Jung et al. (2024)

병합 트리에 기반한 은하 매칭: 다양한 해상도에 대한 대조 연구

Sungwook E. Hong #4 Co-author Jaehyun Lee #5 Co-author
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL IF 4.9 A 등급 International collaboration

Abstract

We introduce a novel halo/galaxy matching technique between two cosmological simulations with different resolutions, which utilizes the positions and masses of halos along their subhalo merger tree. With this tool, we conduct a study of resolution biases through the galaxy-by-galaxy inspection of a pair of simulations that have the same simulation configuration but different mass resolutions, utilizing a suite of IllustrisTNG simulations to assess the impact on galaxy properties. We find that, with the subgrid physics model calibrated for TNG100-1, subhalos in TNG100-1 (high resolution) have -0.5 dex higher stellar masses than their counterparts in the TNG100-2 (low resolution). It is also discovered that the subhalos with M_gas ∼ 10^8.5 M_sun in TNG100-1 have ∼0.5 dex higher gas mass than those in TNG100-2. The mass profiles of the subhalos reveal that the dark matter masses of subhalos in TNG100-2 converge well with those from TNG100-1, except within 4 kpc of the resolution limit. The differences in stellar mass and hot gas mass are most pronounced in the central region. We exploit machine learning to build a correction mapping for the physical quantities of subhalos from low- to high-resolution simulations (TNG300-1 and TNG100-1), which enables us to find an efficient way to compile a high-resolution galaxy catalog even from a low-resolution simulation. Our tools can easily be applied to other large cosmological simulations, testing and mitigating the resolution biases of their numerical codes and subgrid physics models.

AI Classification

Maturity Tier

Tier 1 — Classical ML

AI Role

parameter-estimation

supporting

Techniques

classical-ML

Tasks

regression/parameter-estimation

Subfield

galaxies

simulation

Flags

Develops AI method
· Classification confidence: 100%